Monday, June 4, 2018

Side-by-Side Comparison of NDP, Liberal & Conservative Platforms on First Nation Issues for Ontario Election 2018

Gov’mt to Gov’mt Relationship
Yes, will sign accord, will work on stable revenue sources w First Nations (FNs)
Yes, already have an accord
Land transfers back to First Nations
? Will try to resolve land claims w FNs & Canada
Resource revenue sharing
Yes, will share revenue w FNs,
will give ON’s mining taxes to FNs
($218M over 5yrs)
No? will continue to share “benefits of resource development” w FNs & Metis
Implement TRC
Calls to Action
Yes, will start w action items under prov jurisdiction
Journey Together plan + $250M/3yrs (in progress)
Contribute to First Nation Health
Yes, will double ON investment to $209M/year in FN Health Action Plan,
FNs will decide health funding priorities, ex.
expanded suicide prevention, more doctor time on reserve,
more health care workers,
more FN midwives,
increase FN role in frontline care
Yes, $80M over 4 yrs to expand child & youth mental health services for kids at risk,
$220M over 3 years for improved access to healthcare, mental health, addiction, palliative care, Indigenous leadership in healthcare delivery

Address First Nation Hydro Costs
Yes, FN exempt from Hydro costs,
FN ownership stake in Hydro
Reduce Hydro costs for remote communities by up to 50%
Safe Drinking Water
Will address water infrastructure on reserve, then bill Ottawa
Childcare on Reserve
Yes, $40M over 3 yrs for culturally relevant childcare on reserve,
4500 new spaces on reserve
$290M to double childcare spaces on reserve,
$70M over 2 yrs for off-reserve children & families
First Nation Education
Jordan’s Principle
No specific mention, but will pay for health services & infrastructure on reserve first, argue w feds later
First Nation Policing
Yes, will double ON investment in FNs to $30M, joint development of stand alone legislation
Opt into provincial policing framework & create FN Police Service Boards
Yes, will continue to support inquiry, provide family supports,
 increase resources to solve cold cases
Yes, long-term strategy to end violence against Indig women,
Address human trafficking & support survivors*
Address problematic Far North Act
Yes, will replace it
Jobs & Training & Economic development
Yes, will prioritize FN training on & off-reserve,
Partner w FNs to develop green energy,
will work w FNs to develop minimum targets for FN procurement
Yes, $30M over 2 years for skills training,
Expanded role for institutes
First Nations/Indigenous  Institutes
Yes, $28M in Friendship Centre repairs,
$91M over 6yrs to 28 Centres,
$41M programming for children & youth
Yes, will support stronger role for Indigenous institutes, work with urban communities for off-reserve programs
First Nation Housing
Yes, will increase funds for Indigenous Supportive Housing Program
Indigenous Languages & Culture
Yes, will support Indigenous languages,
Youth cultural camps, will support Indigenous culture
Social Assistance & Income Security
Yes, will work w FN Income Security Reform Working Group & Urban Indigenous Table to implement Roadmap for Change Report
Yes, will enhance access to culturally safe & responsive social assistance
North, Remote Communities
Will replace Far North Act,
$1B to get Ring of Fire moving now,
Collaborate w FNs to get infrastructure projects moving
Part of $1B commitment = year round access road to Ring of Fire,
continue support Wataynikaney Power Grid project (16 remote FNs),
gas price watchdog,
invest more northern hospitals, schools, transportation,
$500M/3yrs broadband,
Increase access to mental health for Indigenous youth
First Nation
Treaty Rights
Ensure treaty rights respected
First Nation Education
Curriculum will include Indigenous history, colonialism, residential schools, reconciliation
UNDRIP into provincial law
Implement all TRC Calls to Action – starting with those in provincial jurisdiction
Address Crisis in Foster Care
Yes, will work with FN leaders & experts to identify needs of FN kids,
No more solitary confinement,
Mediation not courts,
Goal = 0 kids in care
Justice System
Ban policing carding,
Police training in human rights & racism
Yes, will create bicultural justice centres,
Culturally responsive supports in bail system,
Improve FN repres on juries
Ban policing carding,
Police training in human rights & racism
Data collection & analysis w partners,
Increase diversity in gov’mt, boards, commissions,
anti-racism education & training
Expand parks & create new ones in consultation w FNs,
Will clean up Wabigoon Mercury,
Fund mercury treatment centre,
 Additional $12M for retroactive payments for mercury disability
Support FNs to transition to non-fossil fuel energy to minimize impact,
$85M Grassy Narrows remediation


*Please note: this chart is based exclusively on what is contained in the three platforms in terms of what they are promising going forward. It does not include external documents or statement, nor does it report on the past performances of any governments over time. It is merely a snapshot of what is being promised if you elect that party. Please send me a note if you see an error - this is accurate as of May 30, 2018.

For a summary analysis of these platforms, please see my article in Lawyer's Daily at:

Or, for those without access to Lawyer's Daily, please find it on my blog here:

The First Nations' Agenda in the Ontario Election

*This article was originally published in Lawyer's Daily on June 4, 2018

Prime Minister Trudeau and his Liberal Party have been taking a significant amount of heat for their collective failures to act on their substantive promises to First Nations — including, water, housing, education health and Aboriginal, treaty and land rights and title — as well as his approval of the Kinder Morgan pipeline without First Nation free, prior and informed consent.

Here in Ontario, many First Nations also have their focus on Election 2018 and what it might mean for their relationship with the Crown in right of the province of Ontario. In theory, it shouldn’t matter which party gets elected in Ontario assuming they follow the rule of law which includes respecting Indigenous laws, the right to be self-determining, inherent rights, Aboriginal rights and title, treaty rights and the right to free, prior and informed consent. However, we know from practice that federal and provincial governments breach Aboriginal rights more than they honour them — so in that respect, it really does matter which party is elected — at least to some degree.

It is important for voters — First Nations and Ontarians alike — to be familiar with the actual platforms of each party and not just their catchy slogans. We need to know in what ways these candidates will move forward in a spirit of reconciliation with First Nations in concrete terms. To this end, only two of three major parties have grown-up platforms — the NDP and the Liberals. The Conservatives don’t have an actual platform — unless we include the 12 promises made on the landing page of Doug Ford’s website — none of which contain more than a few sentences or mention Indigenous issues. Of the three platforms, only the NDP and Liberals have commitments specific to First Nations.

The NDP and Liberal platforms share similar promises to First Nations, including their general commitment to reconciliation and to maintaining a government-to-government relationship. They also both commit to maintain support for the national inquiry into murdered and missing Indigenous women and girls as well as addressing racism in the justice system. Both also commit to cleaning up the mercury contamination at Grassy Narrows and to ensuring that the Ring of Fire is developed.

Responsibility for First Nations health care has been the subject of much debate between the federal government’s section 91(24) jurisdiction in regards to “Indians and lands reserved for the Indians” and the provincial government’s section 92(7) jurisdiction in relation to hospitals. This debate has largely left out First Nation jurisdiction and the treaty responsibility to provide health care — a responsibly which is shared by the Crown in Right of Canada and the province. However, unlike other provinces, both NDP and Liberal platforms in Ontario make significant funding commitments to fill federal underfunding in health care on reserve.

There are key areas where the NDP and Liberal platforms differ. The NDP promises to work with First Nations to create stable revenue sources, including resource revenue sharing. One of those commitments is to transfer all taxes made from mining in Ontario to First Nations, which the NDP estimate to be about $218M over five years. The Liberal platform on the other hand does not specifically commit to share in resource revenues, but only agrees to share in the “benefits of resource development” which could literally mean anything, but most likely refers to the usual jobs and community projects.

In a similar vein, the NDP also specifically commits to respect First Nation treaty rights— something the Liberal platform does not address. Neither party addresses Aboriginal title and treaty land issues, or the addition of much-needed lands to reserves, except the Liberals who agree to continue land claim negotiations trilaterally with First Nations and the federal government. One need only look at the long-standing Six Nations land claim for the Haldimand tract as an example of how ineffective these negotiations are as “solutions” to land claims.

Another critical area where the NDP and Liberals differ is in how they plan to address the crisis over over-representation of First Nations children in the foster care system — something federal Indigenous Services Minister Jane Philpott called a “humanitarian crisis.” Yet despite the crisis, the federal government has delayed complying with the orders of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal to end racial discrimination and properly fund First Nation child and family services. Therefore, it matters whether or not the province of Ontario will step in. The Liberals have not made any commitments to address this crisis, but the NDP has promised to work toward the goal of no First Nation children in care; to end the use of solitary confinement for children; and to work with First Nation leaders and experts to identify the needs of these children.

Both the NDP and Liberals commit to making First Nations a priority in terms of skills training. Neither made mention of specific contributions to First Nation post-secondary education, though the Liberals currently provide some funding to First Nations to attend university as well as support Indigenous educational institutes. Both plan to support Indigenous institutes and programming for Indigenous children, youth and families living off-reserve. Only the Liberals have made a commitment to fund 4,500 new childcare spaces on reserve and $70M over two years for childcare spaces for off-reserve children and families. This is a significant commitment given the fact that most children on reserve live in poverty and their homes are mostly headed by single mothers who could use childcare support for education, training and employment.

Ultimately, both the NDP and Liberals make significant commitments to First Nations. The Conservatives have made no commitments at all. In fact, the 12 bullets on Ford’s webpage tend to show more of an obsession with Kathleen Wynne and ending carbon taxes. So far, all we have to go by is Ford’s reported failure to respond to requests for his Indigenous platform; his alleged refusal to allow an Indigenous woman to one of his events; he and his family’s alleged involvement in the drug trade; his alleged need to hire actors at events as supporters; and his alleged purchase of bogus memberships to support Conservative candidates — let alone his Trump-like views on women’s reproductive rights and climate change. He is not likely to be a strong candidate for the First Nation vote.

Finally, there was no firm commitment by any party to address First Nation land and resource ownership or specific treaty rights. Nor was there any firm commitment to implement and respect the right of First Nations to free, prior and informed consent before any provincial decisions, laws or actions are implemented that might impact First Nation rights and title.

In the end, whoever is elected will face the same issues as Trudeau and will have to decide whether reconciliation includes the rule of law, including Indigenous law, treaty law and constitutional laws, or more empty promises.

*Link to the article that originally appeared in Lawyer's Daily on June 4, 2018